Authors' reply to Mawer and Wilcox and Mullish and Williams.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Mawer and Wilcox point out that newer antibiotics may be superior to vancomycin for treating recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. However, the gulf in efficacy between these treatments and faecal transplantation is so large that transplantation will remain the treatment of choice, especially when it is much cheaper and does not risk further antibiotic related problems and drug resistance. Mullish and Williams point out the considerable practical challenges facing clinicians in the UK. We agree that rules should be relaxed or changed to allow easy access to donors or well regulated stool banks in other centres or countries, and that investment is needed in screening donor samples to improve compatibility.
منابع مشابه
Author’s Reply to “A Note on the Simulation of Gas Diffusion in Capillaries and Porous Solids”
متن کامل
Author’s Reply to “A Note on the Simulation of Gas Diffusion in Capillaries and Porous Solids”
متن کامل
How to reply to referees' comments when submitting manuscripts for publication
Background: The publication of articles in peer-reviewed scientific journals is a fairly complex and stepwise process that involves responding to referees’ comments. Little guidance is available in the biomedical literature on how to deal with such comments. Objective: The objective of this article is to provide guidance to notice writers on dealing with peer review comments in a way that maxim...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- BMJ
دوره 351 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015